FOOTBALL – Arouca responds to the Chamber: “Narcissistic, pedantic and authoritarian attitudes” (Arouca)

“It was stunning and offended that the Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda acknowledged what was stated as we speak by the Municipality of Arouca.” This is how Arouca’s lengthy speech begins, with 22 factors, in response to Wednesday’s debate (see associated articles).

It is recalled that the Municipality of Arouca issued an announcement that “was compelled to invite the GNR to the Municipal Stadium”, which is its location, “to minimize the obstacles that stop the parking of the car parking zone”, to park the vehicles. which will probably be used as a car parking zone for the Feira das Colheitas.

According to the metropolis council, these in control of Arouca had already threatened to shut the doorways of the stadiums, to stop entry, if the municipality didn’t do a few of the crucial issues, and the risk was carried out. The situation is «strongly rejected» by the City Council, which in the final a part of the identical assertion gives data on the lease settlement for the stadium.

Now Arouca says that the communiqué of the City Council “deliberately distorts the details acknowledged there as a result of it makes disgusting and contradictory assumptions about the competence and reasoning of the leaders of FC Arouca”.

“Therefore, towards our will, we’re compelled to come to the individuals to inform the reality”, will be learn in the letter, which remembers that “even when the authorities has a stadium, it doesn’t have all the pieces. the proper of the proprietor, with the proper to use membership”.

Arouca additionally criticizes the municipality’s “lack of dialogue”, he makes a timeline of occasions and explains the causes and the query of the significance of the works talked about in the communiqué of the metropolis council.

And the final a part of the assertion may be very troublesome: “We reiterate our outrage at the oppressive, pedestrian and bureaucratic perspective of the municipality.”

Arouca’s phrases

It was with shock and anger that the Futebol Clube de Arouca, SDUQ Lda acknowledged what was stated as we speak, by the Municipality of Arouca, as a result of it intentionally distorts what was stated there as a result of it creates offensive emotions and claims of benefit. I additionally take into consideration the leaders of FC Arouca.

Therefore, towards our will, we have now the obligation to come to individuals to inform the reality.

1 – The events – FC AROUCA SDUQ Lda and the Municipality of Arouca – signed an settlement for the proper to use the stadium and its important components, which embrace the car parking zone.

2 – In return, we pay the hire to use.

3- The contract is in impact and what we have now to do is up to date.

4 – Therefore, the Municipality allowed the use of the Municipal Stadium to the Futebol Clube de Arouca, and, opposite to what was talked about in the unsuccessful Communiqué, though the Municipal is the identical proprietor, it doesn’t have the proprietor. rights, being the identical filled with rights to use the Club (FCA, SUDQ Lda.).

5- This doesn’t stop the Municipality from utilizing the cultural, leisure and sporting actions, in accordance to the provisions of the lease settlement.

6 – The Municipality can not pressure its use with no little dialogue or negotiation with the “tenant”, since we’re in a democracy the place all rights, freedoms and ensures have to be revered.

7 – The Municipality solely knowledgeable FC Arouca, to maintain a live performance at the Stadium, with out making certain the monitoring and safety of the website, and permitting entry to loos and different areas.

8 – Arouca instantly and in good religion spoke to the Municipality that the switch of the website shouldn’t be doable, for causes associated to safety and the preparation of coaching video games and the preparation of video games with the purpose of collaborating in skilled cultural competitions. of the Portuguese League.

9 – We had been stunned by the lack of communication with the Municipality about the modifications that had taken place, however we had been certain that frequent sense would prevail.

10 – However, on the night of the match between FC Arouca and Vitória de Guimarães, and with out discover, an organization went to the stadium to arrange the sport, and the membership instantly expressed its issues, with safety points. it is a threat that its placement can characterize with the reception of social and sports activities followers.

11 – Fortunately, the firm acknowledged the validity of our issues and refused to arrange a stage at the venue, on the eve of a excessive-threat sport.

12 – Once once more, we repeat to the Municipality that utilizing the stadium for a live performance disrupts the coaching of the soccer group, particularly since they’ve a sport scheduled of their stadium.

13 – After fixed insistence, we held a gathering with some representatives of the Municipality, regretting, nonetheless, that our President was not current, as a result of certainly, contemplating what he has in our Football Club and its leaders, this is able to not be doable. it is carried out.

14 – At that assembly, we defined doubtless and clearly, all the time in good religion, the causes that didn’t enable us to settle for the occasion to be held at the Stadium.

15 – Being certain that the Municipality realized the difficulties and risks that happen throughout this occasion in the work and preparation of the membership.

16 – Later, we discovered about the change in the live performance venue, which revived our religion in the concepts of our mayor.

17 – It occurred that we had been additionally stunned by the implementation of the authority of the Municipality with the purpose of utilizing the car parking zone in the stadium, ignoring the issues and wants that the group had beforehand expressed, and what they agreed on the switch of the Stadium.

18 – Since it may be utilized by the Municipal for sports activities, tradition or leisure, unrelated to its use as a car parking zone, and ignoring the distractions and conflicts which might be used for coaching and video games already organized.

19 – We have our mayors pretty much as good individuals, who observe the legal guidelines and tasks thought of in the agreements, and we have now all the time defended the want for the vitality of the neighborhood to work collectively to reward our noble village and area.

20 – Therefore, we have now tried a number of instances to get the assist of the Municipal in the funds and modifications which have been crucial in the Municipal Stadium (supplied by Liga Portugal, IPDJ and UEFA), since they’re all the time answered in the mistaken method.

21 – The group was ready, in the final two years, for the sole purpose, to perform the works that had been awarded at a value of greater than € 100,000.00, to shield the Municipal in accordance to what was given to him.

22 – Now, the contract for the distribution of the stadium makes it in order that each events, and the Municipality, compelled to adjust to this, can not cease and eliminate it because it needs, forgetting that it doesn’t have the alternative to eliminate the Stadium, being the identical “lessee” …

Regarding the validity and respectability of the opinions of the leaders of the Futebol Clube de Arouca, we perceive that the feedback which might be meaningless, pointless and completely different from the opinion of the majority of Arouquenses, say rather a lot about those that make them. than what they’re.

In truth, FC Arouca is as we speak a revered membership in the world and in the world due to its distinctive method to skilled sports activities competitions, which has introduced rather a lot to our neighborhood, primarily due to its leaders and the cautious administration that has been carried out, with few issues . who has any help from the Municipal.

Being good individuals, revered and respecting the legislation, not being criminals of the Municipality or the state’s wealth.

Based on the above, we reiterate our indignation at the hypocritical, touring and authoritarian perspective of the Municipality, which culminated in the Communiqué to which we have now to reply, since a bit democratic spirit and frequent sense can be sufficient for all of this. a scenario to keep away from.

Finally, we wish to take the alternative to want all Arouquenses to take pleasure in the Harvest Fair in the absolute best method.

Leaders of ‘Anena’


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.